> The things you are asking for should be possible with already > available public data. These things would be good, but they are > things that *you* can do. :)
Maybe my English is not good enough but I don't get it: Either you suggest that it will be possible or you're quite sure about that? ... and what about data correction due to dramatic error being discussed. ... and where are those public data anyhow? (you may call me dummy, but I have no clue about that) On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Gregory Maxwell<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Pavlo Shevelo<[email protected]> wrote: >>> A full pairwise defeats table will be posted shortly. >> >> Would you please add detailed statistic summary (number of people >> voted, %% of eligible wikipedians, dice and slice of those to projects >> groups etc.) ? >> ... I mean as detailed as possible - more is better > > {{Sofixit}} > > The things you are asking for should be possible with already > available public data. These things would be good, but they are > things that *you* can do. :) > > Please save the election committees' cycles for dealing with whatever > non-public stuff remains. :) > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
