Hoi, We do have those kinds of statistics already.. aggregating is important because such an overall numbers can be considered a KPI while an individual statistic is interesting.
I learned that KPI is key performance indicator ... :) I still have to think what the acronym is there for Thanks, GerardM 2009/8/13 John at Darkstar <vac...@jeb.no> > Aggregated statistics for a complete GLAM is interesting, but it seems > like they ask about usage stats and metadata about individual items. > > For example it is _very_ interesting that a otherwise rather anonymous > photo from 1890 from the GallriNOR-collection is used in an article > about Oat that has 1100 page views each day at English Wikipedia. (From > memory, hopefully the correct article) This is probably several orders > more than their own traffic on that photo. > > John > > Gerard Meijssen wrote: > > Hoi, > > Combine this with aggregated statistics for a particular GLAM and do this > > for any GLAM we have material for. This is not to show the most important > > GLAM but it is to help them realise and recognise for themselves and for > > their sponsors that we contribute to their social relevance. It helps us > > argue why improved annotations will increase traffic to their website. > > > > It is absolutely important not to make a competition out of these > statistics > > because GLAMS cannot be compared. What is important is that we contribute > to > > the visibility of a GLAM and its collection. It is obvious why these > > statistics have to be double checked, because it will be a vital argument > in > > releasing material to us and in building a relationship. > > Thanks, > > Gerard > > > > 2009/8/13 John at Darkstar <vac...@jeb.no> > > > >> I stumbled upon this too during discussions with institutions in Norway, > >> it seems like the number of times some material is accessed is a very > >> interesting selling point. It is although not necessary to store the > >> image any specific place for this, it is the actual statistics that is > >> interesting. > >> > >> John > >> > >> Gerard Meijssen wrote: > >>> Hoi, > >>> Not necessarily. One acronym I learned was KPI, when a GLAM has as a > key > >>> performance indicator the number of times a picture is actually > accessed, > >> it > >>> may affect the amount of subsidy they get. There is no reason why an > >> image > >>> cannot be made available to the people who want that image on their > hard > >>> drive. > >>> > >>> So I mean really there may be more to it. > >>> Thanks, > >>> GerardM > >>> > >>> 2009/8/12 David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>>> 2009/8/12 Kat Walsh <k...@mindspillage.org>: > >>>> > >>>>> I'm not sure what the technical challenges you had in mind are, but I > >>>>> can think of plenty of reasons to argue against hotlinking and I > don't > >>>>> want to let the point slip by. A few: > >>>> The ones who want hotlinking want it as a way of making the images not > >>>> free. l mean, really. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> - d. > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> foundation-l mailing list > >>>> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > >>>> Unsubscribe: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> foundation-l mailing list > >>> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> foundation-l mailing list > >> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > foundation-l mailing list > > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l