By the way, has Batzel v. Smith been overturned? If so, maybe I'll reconsider. If not, bring it on. Maybe I can even get the EFF to defend me.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>wrote: > >> 2009/8/25 Anthony <[email protected]>: >> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> >> 2009/8/25 Gregory Kohs <[email protected]>: >> >> > I said a few things that brought the Foundation into a light of >> >> disrepute. >> >> > Is that the problem? >> >> >> >> If you said anything that could be libellous then that could be a >> >> problem. Whoever did the publishing would be liable. >> > >> > >> > I'll do the publishing, if that's the problem. I'm in the United >> States, so >> > I'm protected by Section 230 of the CDA. >> >> I suggest you run that by a lawyer, my understanding of the CDA is >> that is isn't that broad. >> > > Nah, I promise, I'll publish it. I've read enough case law to be confident > that I couldn't be successfully sued for publishing that audio recording. I > also trust Greg not to engage in slander, frankly. And I'm pretty much > judgement-proof anyway. > > "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as > the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information > content provider." > > I'm a user of an interactive computer service, and the information was > provided by another information content provider. > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
