On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Steven Walling<[email protected]> wrote: > Very good question. I'd say two major factors: > 1. Support from scientists. Founded by one of the best-known scientists > alive, the EOL automatically gained support from the biological sciences in > academia. Support from the scientific/academic community is the only reason > their largely single-author system has flourished in my opinion.
Why cant we have this? It would be nice to see board seats going to professional/academic leaders in the fields for each of our smaller projects. This would bring expertise, connections, focus, and funding. -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
