On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Svip <svi...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/8/26 Anthony <wikim...@inbox.org>: > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org > >wrote: > > > >> Let me say for the record that I'm not at all happy with this data > >> being released, since it allows vote-buying. > > > > > > What's wrong with vote-buying? It's no worse than seat-buying. > > I am not sure I understand the logic in this comment. > > If something is bad; then it doesn't matter if something else is > equally bad? And we shouldn't bother fighting either one unless we > can fight both? > > Makes little sense to me.
You're adding in a "therefore" which I never intended. I don't have a problem with seat-buying, so long as the current board approves of the candidate, anyway. And in the case of a WMF election the current board has the final say in whether or not to seat the candidate. So you'll have to start by showing why seat-buying is bad. And then you'll probably have to find a new foundation to support. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l