2009/8/27 Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Thomas Dalton<[email protected]> > wrote: >> I think part of the problem is that there were some odd ideas about >> how the Advisory Board would work. For example, it has a chair. I >> can't work out why. Why would the advisory board ever meet as a group? >> Being an expert is only of use if you are an expert in the subject >> being discussed. Individual members of the advisory board should be > [snip] > > Presumably a chair can track membership and expertise and handle > routing messages to the relevant parties, participate with recruiting, > and otherwise act as an impedance match between the board proper and > the advisory board. I'm not sure if that was what was envisioned, or > if chair is the best name for it, but I think that it's a reasonable > alternative to the sort of flat structure that you're describing.
I guess that is somewhere being a chair and a secretary. The job title isn't important, as long as the role is clearly defined. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
