On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>wrote:
> 2009/8/28 Anthony <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Stephen Bain <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Anthony<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > It seems to me to be begging the question. You don't answer the > question > >> > "how bad is vandalism" by assuming that vandalism is generally > reverted. > >> > >> Can you suggest a better metric then? > > > > > > I must admit I don't understand the question. > > He means what would you measure in order to draw conclusions about the > severity of vandalism. > Umm...you would count the number of instances of vandalism? Is the question how to objectively *define* "vandalism"? If not, I still don't understand the question. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
