2009/8/28 Michael Snow <[email protected]>: > As the portion of your email making that caveat did not appear until > after quoting another portion of Ting's message, suggesting that it > would be addressing some other aspect of the discussion, I missed that > you had hedged what seemed to be a pretty plain statement. Honestly, > considering the significance of this responsibility, I would have > expected the sentence to be qualified immediately since the point > negates so much of the basic assertion. > > Meanwhile, there have been a lot of messages to read on this list > recently, and I've learned as part of list etiquette to trim replies to > the material you're responding to, as a courtesy to readers. I apologize > for overlooking the additional context as a result, but I had no > intention of misrepresenting you and I don't think it was particularly > stupid, immature, or malicious.
Apology accepted. I'll classify it as "careless" instead. It really is important to read the whole of a message and not jump to conclusions half way through. I don't expect people to stop reading half way through so my emails will frequently not make sense if you do so. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
