On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2009/8/28 Robert Rohde <[email protected]>: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Anthony<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Once we have the list, anyone is free to examine it any way they want, > and > >> show their results. But we're talking about probably less than 200 > >> instances of vandalism here, so it'll be quite easy (and fun) to > lambaste > >> anyone whose methods produce false positives. > > > Comments like this discourage people like me from putting in the time > > and effort to do this sort of work. Offering constructive criticism > > is one thing, but looking forward to the "fun" of "lambast[ing]" the > > good faith efforts of others is offensive and not in keeping with the > > collaborative spirit necessary to run WMF projects. > > > I suggest that treating Anthony's foundation-l contributions as > anything other than destructive trolling is probably a waste of time. Comments like this discourage people like me from putting in the time and effort to do this sort of work. Okay, no they don't, but I thought it would be funny to whine about it like that. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
