On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Anders Wennersten < [email protected]> wrote:
> One idea could be to introduce a rule that each user should limit > his/her entries to maximum one/day and thread > > I am sure this would lead to better quality, without stopping valuable > input, and make the list much more comprehensive and useful. (With this > rule last days 80 entires would probalbly been limited to something like > 20) > I really don't understand what use you're trying to get out of this mailing list. You say "On Wikipedia we all work hard to work for consensus (all voices are welcome) and stop people dominating a subject." Maybe what you want is a wiki, and not an unmoderated mailing list? Could you give an example of an unmoderated mailing list which has successfully imposed a rule such as the one you suggest? I don't think it's going to succeed in providing the usefulness you desire, and I'm sure it's going to destroy the usefulness that Thomas, myself, and many others on this list do desire. If you'd like to start a moderated foundation-l, in addition to the regular foundation-l, that might be useful. But it's considerably inappropriate for you to sign up for a mailing list that many of us have been enjoying for years and in one month decide you want to alter it to suit your tastes. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
