So, I think that such a project works well with the concept of NPOV. I think you can break the site into two distinct parts.
Part 1: You collect opinions of various sorts in various ways. Part 2: You organize them in terms of their relative significance to each other and summarize them in a disinterested voice. This would be a lot like Wikibooks and Wikipedia; people write stuff on Wikibooks and then people cite those books on Wikipedia. -Josh On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Victor Vasiliev <[email protected]> wrote: > Sage Ross wrote: > > I think this is an excellent, long overdue idea and something > > Wikimedia should be interested in. I was actually thinking of > > proposing something like this at strategy.wikimedia.org (and may still > > do so). > > > > I don't think that creating such a project within Wikimedia would be a > great idea. NPOV is one of the most important Wikimedia principles. > > --vvv > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- I am running the Arizona Rock'n'Roll marathon with Team in Training. Help me reach my fundraising goals: http://pages.teamintraining.org/ma/pfchangs10/joshuagay _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
