No, they most certainly would not. However it's a bit of a moot point as if I recall correctly there were only 1 or 2 admins and they've both left since.
Mark On 9/1/09, Peter Gervai <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 08:29, Mark Williamson<[email protected]> wrote: >> It certainly should, ideally, be the same Wikipedia - in my opinion >> the ideal situation would have a converter on ro.wp. However, I don't >> think most Romanian Wikipedians would approve of this (as I mentioned >> earlier in the thread). > > A worrying sidenote: cheking the page > > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Moldovan_Wikipedia#Motion_to_end_discussion > > seem to reveal that most of the people go for deletion of the mowp are > Romanians. Would they support to have old mowp admins as rowp admins, > wouldn't they? > > g > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- skype: node.ue _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
