While I don't agree wit most of the criticisms (this is a survey after all, not a philosophy thesis; asking extremely precise questions is not the point), the --/++ questions do seem like a bad design choice. There should be at least clear indication whether an absoulte answer is expected (if I contribute very rarely to Commons, then I will do all the activities very rarely), or a relative one (most often/least often). If the two types of answers are mixed, the results will be meaningless.
Also, next time you should set up a test version of the survey for translators. Not only does this make their work easier, you get dozens of testers for free. E. g. when I translated the survey, I assumed the question about why you do not use Commons is an alternate path to the ones about the way you use it. If I knew it will be asked from everyone, I would have noted that it needs to be rephrased. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
