2009/11/5 David Gerard <[email protected]>: > 2009/11/5 Andrew Gray <[email protected]>:
>> We did astonishingly, staggeringly, unbelievably, improbably well with >> Wikipedia. Failing to replicate that is to be expected; it's unlikely >> we could deliberately manage such a success without a shedload of good >> luck. "It's got a wiki in it" isn't a magic spell, after all. > I've always thought the next likely hit would be Commons. It'd need > something like the cats-as-tags feature, though. I'd like not to be > able to describe it as "Sorta like Getty Images but the search sucks." (And I know the search has improved a lot of late.) - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
