I believe that a "verified" account system for GLAMs specifically doing encyclopedic work (not for businesses, etc) would not be too difficult to work out, and would be well worth any such effort.
Such systems, though nothing is 100%, have worked quite well for many other websites. Thanks, Pharos On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hoi, > When they are blocked like it happened with the Tropenmuseum, I will ask the > person who did this to reconsider... There has to be a reason for a block > and these organisations do what they do and they do it very well. The notion > that a block on sight is always good is .... not reasonable. > Thanks, > GerardM > > > > 2009/12/5 John Vandenberg <[email protected]> > >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Gerard Meijssen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hoi, >> > I want to give you two different group / company accounts that I think >> are >> > valuable.. >> > >> > Tropenmuseum... If you do not know about it, read the Tropenmuseum >> article >> > on Commons >> > Calcey - a company from Sri Lanka has adopted the localisation of the >> > Sinhala language. We are really grateful for their work. >> > >> > There are more great examples of companies, groups that make a difference >> > ... I would like to know more good examples.. >> >> You say that now, but what happens when they are blocked. >> >> Or maybe they say something that sounds like a legal threat; are they >> speaking for the company? >> >> -- >> John Vandenberg >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
