On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Ray Saintonge <[email protected]> wrote: > K. Peachey wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 3:54 PM, The Cunctator <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yes. This is idiotic. The logo contest followed the same rules as all other >>> submissions to Wikipedia -- they were submitted under the GFDL. >>> >> Yes, but not everyone knows that and any tom, dick or harry that >> randomly finds them doesn't know that, that is why they should be >> clearly labelled with their source(/s), licenses(/s) and any other >> appropriate information on their [the images] description pages. >> Someone could even make a template saying that they are part of a >> series from whatever contest that they are from. >> >> > You're shifting the burden onto the wrong people. If the images followed > the general rule that prevailed when they were uploaded the presumption > is that they followed that rule unless there was an exception specified > *at the time*. If rules have changed since then it's up to those who > complain to add the proper notices instead of acting like vandals. > Admins who don't know that don't deserve to be admins. > > Ec And where did i say I was ever a Admin? (Personally I don't have the sysop bit on any WMF wiki afaik)
-Peachey _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
