-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, William Pietri wrote: > we think there are some interface changes are > going to improve both the user experience and the value of the enwiki > trial.
Why did it take this request from enwiki to have the UX aspect of flagged revisions taken seriously? This has been one of the main complaints about the implementation since day zero. All other complaints I've heard have been regarding the idea, not the implementation. The UX problems are real, yet were unaddressed until very recently. Why? Will the Foundation be expending effort on this using the now-permanent UX team? - -Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuQKecACgkQst0AR/DaKHvQuQCfRtmdjuebACr8aPHVyRBcCZEQ BIgAoNeUEPnZE9iR6TK3kPSnrTv4CrCn =IS29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
