+1 to what Geoffrey said. Steven Walling
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Geoffrey Plourde <[email protected]>wrote: > I support the changes, its cleaned up my inbox and made the discussions I'm > seeing more worthy of attention. The list is running better than ever. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Benjamin Lees <[email protected]> > To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, March 16, 2010 9:43:22 PM > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] How to kill a mailing list > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Anthony wrote: > > > August 2009: 1030 > > > September 2009: 791 > > > October 2009: 326 > > > November 2009: 513 > > > December 2009: 234 > > > January 2010: 207 > > > February 2010: 213 > > > March 2010: ??? > > > > > > > And your point. > > > > Are you claiming credit? > > > > Or are you claiming to be the victim? > > > > > The autopsy indicates that it was a suicide. > > Presumably he feels that the way the list has been managed has contributed > to its decline. I don't disagree in that regard. On the other hand, raw > message counts can be misleading: are 200-message threads a good thing? > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
