Samuel Klein wrote: > Wow, I go offline for half a day and all commons breaks loose... > > Why have in-use artworks been deleted? Even the strongest versions of > the proposed policy that Jimbo started at Commons:Sexual_content > explicitly supports art and illustrations. > > > I think the clearest edge case was a Decadent Movement artist, whom Jimbo "the art critic" decided was after all just old porn.
Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
