On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:43 PM, THURNER rupert
<rupert.thur...@wikimedia.ch> wrote:

> i might be wrong, but wasn't it _very_ important to have a clear
> separation of concerns?

Whether or not this is legally important, it is socially essential.

> on the other hand, i consider jimbo trying it and proving that it
> finally fails  a brilliant idea and a very good case to prevent future
> legal actions against the wmf and the chapters :)

Now there's a thought...

SJ

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Reply via email to