On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:43 PM, THURNER rupert <[email protected]> wrote:
> i might be wrong, but wasn't it _very_ important to have a clear > separation of concerns? Whether or not this is legally important, it is socially essential. > on the other hand, i consider jimbo trying it and proving that it > finally fails a brilliant idea and a very good case to prevent future > legal actions against the wmf and the chapters :) Now there's a thought... SJ _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
