On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Mike Godwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > We were going to have nonsense articles in Fox whatever we do - that's > > the way Fox is. Now we have an article on the BBC News website (a very > > respected news outlet, unlike Fox) saying there is infighting in > > Wikipedia which we wouldn't have had if Jimmy hadn't acted. I'm far > > more concerned about the BBC article than I would be any Fox story. > > > > BBC got the story from Fox. There would have been a Fox story regardless, > and I wouldn't assume that BBC would not have picked up the more > sensationalistic story that Fox was hoping to run. > > > --Mike, who's been doing this media-ecology stuff for a couple of decades > now ;) > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > "It's a profit deal!" ~The Jerk -- ~Keegan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
