David Goodman wrote: > I think we will only make progress when we accept the apologies of the > people involved. I can understand that they want to at least formally > defend the original board statement, but I think they--and we all- > -recognize that the discussion has moved in a somewhat more permissive > direction now than that first statement implied. When people admit > they've acting over-hastily, as by now I think essentially everyone > has, I don't see the point of continue to berate them about it. > > We're returning to normalcy. Perhaps the most useful thing people with > any view on the issue could do is contribute to specific discussions > on improvements in how we handle challenges, on possible software > improvements , and on deletion and undeletion of particular images. >
Indeed! Moving forward does not depend on determining who was right about historical wrongs.. Ec > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM, K. Peachey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Stuart West <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ...snip... >>> Jimmy acknowledged this wasn't right and I respect his apology. >>> ...snip... >>> - stu >>> >> Yes! because no one would consider >> starting discussion on wiki first before drawing their guns and start >> shooting? >> _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
