Mike.lifeguard wrote: > The globe isn't actually too small, I think it just _looks_ that way > because: > > 1) the new logo has more space in it, in particular at the top > > 2) the new logo is typically viewed with Vector, which has more space > around the logo than monobook did. Take a look at the new logo with > ?useskin=monobook and I think you'll find it looks "larger". In fact, > monobook crowded the logo a bit uncomfortably. > > For use in Vector, I think the logo could be made larger, as it > currently does not fill the space set aside for it. Vector handles the > spacing; the logo doesn't need to have padding in the image as well. > > --Mike
Come on. The v2 *is* smaller. Open http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bc/Wiki.png and http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.png on two different tabs and switch between them. You will notice the change from italic to normal, that the W was bigger (bolder?) on the previous logo (we may want to increase it on v2) and that the ball was bigger. And by bigger I mean that on the previous logo the borders of the circle reached the left border of the W and the right of the A. The v2 goes from the middle of the W to 25% of the A. This is not a visual effect. Put your cursor on the right border of the globe and change tabs. Whoops, now there is almost a full piece to the border. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
