On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The illustration still fosters the notion of some overseeing > gatekeeper on an article expressing editorial control— which is not > the expected behaviour of the system, nor a desired behaviour, nor > something we would even have the resources to do if it were desirable. > In particular there is no per-revision analysis mandated by our > system: Many edits will happen, then someone with the right > permissions will look at a delta from then-to-now and decide that > nothing is terrible in the current version and make it the displayed > version. It's possible that there were terrible intermediate > versions, but it's not relevant.
^that -- ~Keegan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
