Ray Saintonge wrote: > > As an example consider an orphan work last published in the United > States more than seventy years ago. It would at first glance appear to > qualify for the shorter libraries and archives rule for republication. > When it appears at wikisource there is a discussion that results in the > material being removed as a copyright violation. The actual rights owner > or his legal agents have never been a part of the conversation. >
And how are you determining that a work is orphaned? What JuJU do you have to declare that a work is free to use commercially? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
