David Gerard wrote: > On 24 June 2010 19:28, Michael Snow <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That's the meaning, definitely, same as it was in the previous board >> statement. I would observe, too, that for material on user pages, if >> you're even going to ask whether it's educational, what is it going to >> educate people about? That particular user, presumably. And in that >> context, it's pretty hard to rule out any kind of self-expression that >> person has chosen as not being educational about them. It may be >> inappropriate for other reasons, such as community policy or social >> concerns, but this wouldn't really be a basis for enforcing that. >> > Nevertheless - if you're going to make official statements like this, > you can't assume that hundreds of thousands of people are all going to > interpret them the same way, as you seem to have here. > Precisely. We already have too many people ready and willing to take a common sense idea and turn it into rigid policy.
Ec _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
