On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andre, this is a great summary -- I've linked to it from the english
> ws Scriptorium.
>
> Do you see opportunities for the two projects to coordinate their
> wofklows better?
  ^^^^^^^
Clearly this email needed 1 more round of human checking.

SJ

>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Andre Engels <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Typical about the PGDP workflow are an emphasis on quality above
>> quantity (exemplified in running not 1 or 2 but 3 rounds of human
>> checking of the OCR result - correctness in copying is well above
>> 99.99% for most books) and work being done in page-size chunks rather

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Reply via email to