On 07/04/2010 03:40 AM, Eugene Eric Kim wrote: > 1. Decision-making processes for development. Many of the large open > source projects have core teams consisting of both paid and volunteer > developers, and they typically have a decision-making process that is > independent of any single organization. For example, decisions on > Firefox are made by the Firefox core team, not by the Mozilla > Foundation. The Firefox core team happens to be mostly made up of > Mozilla Foundation developers, but that is not a structural > requirement. I believe the same holds true for MediaWiki, and if this > is the case, it's worth making explicit. Where there's ambiguity, it's > worth naming the ambiguity.
The point of the Firefox project is to create a web browser and the core team has control over that. They cannot decide on the structural conditions of their work environment, e.g. who is employed by the Mozilla Foundation. The point of Wikimedia projects is to create free works and the community has control over that. They do not have control of the structural conditions of their work environment, e.g. WMF servers and such. You can't compare the developement of MediaWiki & the Wikimedia community with the development of Firefox & the Firefox core team, because MediaWiki is just a means for a different goal (free works), whereas Firefox is the goal. Regards, Tobias (User:Church of emacs)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
