" in an attempt to impose purely aesthetic choices on the broader community." Impose? You know it can be turned off, right?
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Brandon Harris <bhar...@wikimedia.org>wrote: > > > On 8/2/2010 6:12 PM, MZMcBride wrote: > > A lot of the complaints I heard regarding the Vector rollout were based > in > > the fact that the Wikimedia Usability team has subverted and bastardized > the > > term "usability" in an attempt to impose purely aesthetic choices on the > > broader community. > > This reads to me like you're trying to start a fight with the > Usability > team, and I don't rightly cotton to that idea. The team is comprised of > many people, all with different opinions to be sure - but they are all > *dedicated to the mission.* > > So you should assume good faith, even if you disagree. > > > > And in some cases, the Vector skin has demonstrably made > > the site less usable for "long-term Wikimedia contributors." > > I haven't seen any studies or data that supports this claim but I'd > be > very interested in seeing this demonstrated. > > It is possible for long-term or power-users of Wikimedia software to > change the skin they use if they find serious fault with Vector. > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l