Also raised on the Sexual content talk page in Commons are uploads by User:Midnight68. Some users feel these are out of scope at Commons, and may violate child pornography laws:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Archive001.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_by_User:Midnight68 A. --- On Fri, 6/8/10, private musings <[email protected]> wrote: > From: private musings <[email protected]> > Subject: [Foundation-l] Mini update on sexual content discussions > To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" <[email protected]>, > "Wikimedia Commons Discussion List" <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, 6 August, 2010, 8:23 > G'day all, > > I hope it's appropriate to cross-post this to both commons > and foundation > lists - it seems so to me, and no doubt if there's a > courtesy or practice > I'm unaware of, someone will be kind enough to point it out > :-) (rude words > and nasty comments are ok, but it's better if they rhyme.) > > Discussions at the meta page where Robert Harris is posing > some related > questions is gently dying down - > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:2010_Wikimedia_Study_of_Controversial_Content > > and over on commons we're approaching another poll about > whether to adopt > the 'sexual content' policy proposal - > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Sexual_content#Another_poll.3F > > What appears to be the largest point of discussion extant > is whether or not > media featuring sexual content should contain at least an > assertion that all > of the participants consent to the upload / publishing of > the material - you > can see some folk arguing that we shouldn't apply such a > condition > retrospectively, and maybe not at all - > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Sexual_content#Automatic_deletions_by_noconsent_template > > I believe consent is desirable across the board in regard > to sexual content, > and would like to see this sort of wording ratified as > policy - > http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Sexual_content&oldid=42301328#consent > > The discussions are actually pretty substantial, civil, > useful, and > generally better than we've managed in the past, and of > course the more > outside views on the matter, the better - so if you're at > all inclined to > share your thoughts on the commons specific side of how WMF > handles sexual > content, please do pipe up, either ahead of, or as part of > the upcoming > poll.... > > cheers, > > Peter, > PM. > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
