So your peer reviewed experience iiis. the co-authoring of a single paper published in a supplement? Less than say, a particularly good management undergrad. Forgive me; a director of marketing at that level does exactly how much direct marketing?
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Gregory Kohs <[email protected]> wrote: > Gerard M. says: > > Dear Greg, > This is not about criticism but about research. With respect I have not > seen > your research papers, I am not aware of your credentials that would make > you > a choice to be considered for being part of a research committee. > > Given that the work of the committee includes work on policies that have to > do with access to confidential data, it seems to me only natural that your > status as being banned from several Wikis is an other reason why you are > easily disqualified from participating in a research committee. > > At that you have had your "test" several times and as a result you are a > known entity. > Thanks, > GerardM > > ++++++++++++++++++++ > > Allow me to make you aware of my credentials, Gerard, since you asked > "with respect". > > I'm the Director of Market Research for a company valued at $52 > billion. I've been making a living with market research for 18 years > now. > > One of my co-authored research papers was published in a scientific > journal supplement: > http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/data/183/3/DC1/1 > > I've written a white paper about research for public relations: > http://www.icrsurvey.com/docs/MR%20for%20PR.doc > > For the more casual reader, I've maintained an occasional blog on > research since 2005: > http://insidemr.blogspot.com/ > > And, I've conducted numerous informal but systematic research studies > about Wikimedia properties: > http://www.mywikibiz.com/Wikipedia_Vandalism_Study > http://toolserver.org/~mzmcbride/watcher/<http://toolserver.org/%7Emzmcbride/watcher/> > <http://toolserver.org/%7Emzmcbride/watcher/> > (You'll have to ask around > about that one.) > http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Survey_about_Wikipedia (Currently, a > bit slow-going on the analysis, due to editing parameters imposed on > the Wikiversity community by Jimmy Wales) > > I am curious about this "access to confidential data" of which you > speak. This presupposes that other members of the vast Wikimedia > community do currently have access to this confidential data. Have > they been vetted in some way that you can be assured that they won't > do something with that data more monstrous than what I would ever do > with such data? I'm trusted with confidential customer account data > by a $52 billion company. > > > ****************** > Meanwhile, D. Gerard says: > > Trolling blogs probably isn't the best resume item, no. HTH! > > ****************** > > No, it's probably not, if only I were "trolling". > > Hope that helps! > > --- > Greg > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
