On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Platonides <[email protected]> wrote:

> Aaron Adrignola wrote:
> > I appreciate your detailed explanation.  If a page at Meta could be
> created
> > to explain this and linked to from the edit summaries this would do much
> to
> > eliminate confusion amongst local administrators.  I do have a concern,
> > however.  I've checked the SUL statuses for many of these accounts
> blocked
> > locally and usually the local blocks only affect less than 20 wikis.
>  What's
> > to say that a mischievous individual couldn't register at one of the
> other
> > 700 wikis without blocks/autoblock in place and do the same thing?  This
> > seems to be a problem in need of a technical solution rather than one
> that
> > creates the situation that prompted my original message.  As it is, it
> seems
> > that even if local blocks for global locks are performed at Wikibooks
> (and
> > elsewhere), you are still going to need to do a CU regardless.
> >
> > -- User:Adrignola
>
> Autoblocking suppressed accounts (Bug 23114) is implemented
> (r64982,r65184,r65185). It just needs to be reviewed and deployed.
>
>
> Ah ha! globally suppressed accounts only I gather? (so not normally locked
ones) May be beneficial to have it as an option for stewards while locking
any account and not just ones that need to be suppressed.


James Alexander
[email protected]
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Reply via email to