Actually, we could routinely use twitter more, asking for input. With the right searchable keywords we might regularly attract both help with the specific problem and new editors. That could become a regular routine. Obviously asking for help in such a forum could also attract cranks and axe grinders too.
Fred > I agree with Peter's comment that Wikipedia could use some added > mechanisms > to improve content ( especially controversial content ). We have a lot > of > great policies however they are often unevenly applied. One mechanism > would > be to apply more thoroughly the policies we have. > > A current problem is the difficult there is in bringing in third party > input > after all other mechanisms have failed on a content issue. We have > ArbCom > however they only deal with behavior not content. This is something that > needs to be addressed so otherwise final arbitration goes to whomever is > willing to but in the most effort. > > -- > James Heilman > MD, CCFP-EM, B.Sc. > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
