2010/9/9 Teofilo <[email protected]> > 2010/9/7, Teofilo <[email protected]>: > > 2010/9/7, Tim Starling <[email protected]>: > > > >> Presumably this conspiracy would have to extend beyond the WMF to > >> PediaPress and Purodha Blissenbach, the developers of Collection and > >> mobile.wikipedia.org respectively. > > > > The absence of a history tab in the mobile format is in my view an > > exact measurement of the temperature of the warmth of the relations > > between the WMF and its contributors. > > > > Let's not call this a conspiracy. Philosopher Pierre Bourdieu would > > call it an unconcious strategy (1). > > The other reason why we can't call this a conspiracy is that a > conspiracy is usually kept secret, while that agenda is known by a lot > of people. They even managed to organise a vote and found a majority > approving it at > > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update/Result > > The result is the adding of "You agree that a hyperlink or URL is > sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license" on every > edit tab footer. > > The result is that it is thought that it is OK to distribute contents > without the history tab, the author's names remaining in a format not > readable on the device the user is using. So all these things are > features of the new vastly known agenda. They are not bugs. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >
There was nothing secret about that vote, we announced it on all wiki's and we kept public archives for our mailinglist. -- Regards, Huib "Abigor" Laurens Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
