David, Not quite sure what you mean by "ratcheted up"? Could you clarify?
Thanks, Steven Walling On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:51 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16 September 2010 22:35, R M Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As promised, the draft report on our study of Controversial Content on >> Wikimedia projects is now available at >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2010_Wikimedia_Study_of_Controversial_Content. >> We're actually planning to release the study on that page in three >> segments, with a day or two in between This first one discusses the general >> principles that animated our observations and recommendations. We are very >> interested in your comments, and will be monitoring them carefully. Your >> feedback will be built into the report we eventually make to the Board in >> early October. And thanks to all for the welcoming reception we've been >> given since our appearance in late June. These are difficult questions to >> deal with, as you all know -- your openness has made it easier for us to do >> so. Robert Harris and Dory Carr-Harris. > > > Please detail the steps to be taken to ensure this is not ratcheted up. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
