On 28 September 2010 18:51, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hoi, > Neither New York nor Hong Kong are independent. So this is not an argument. > It is completely beside the point what is the point is that Kosovo is > administratively a separate area. it has its own issues..
The Serbian chapter agreement says it covers all of Serbia. We need to know what "all of Serbia" means in order to interpret that agreement. There are three ways we could have two chapters: 1) Two national chapters, considering Serbia and Kosovo to be independant. 2) Two sub-national chapters, considering Serbia and Kosovo to be two (non-overlapping) parts of the same country. 3) A national chapter covering all of Serbia, which we consider to include Kosovo, and a sub-national chapter covering just Kosovo overlapping with the national chapter. There are some important technical differences between those arrangements (eg. the third option has all the same issues as have been brought up regarding a Catalan chapter overlapping with a Spanish chapter). It would be great if we could just ignore technicalities, but it is inadvisable. If you just ignore issues that you don't want to resolve, sooner or later you come to regret that decision. We also can't ignore the harm that could be caused by being seen to take sides in the dispute. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
