At the NYT and similar sites, I notice a pattern where the are are a few readers who rather frequently comment on more than a single article, and consequently get to know each other, though not necessarily in a favorable sense. .
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Amory Meltzer <[email protected]> wrote: >>>social communities >> >> I think most would argue that porn is inherently anti-social. I don't see a >> lot of social communities made up of just one person (probably half of IRC). >> >> > > That's a good point, but it does include YouTube, and much of the porn > "universe" these days revolves around file-sharing and adult versions > of YouTube.[1] It also includes the New York Times and other sites > where user-participation is still more of an afterthought, and calling > them "communities" is sort of a stretch. > > [1] > http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hHa_9L1Rwp6lLcVg8mJzB-PBroXg > (Agence France Press) > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
