failed at copy / paste - with apologies, here is the link to the image I would think it best to remove permanently;
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Closeup_of_female_masturbation_pastel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 cheers, Peter, PM. On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:59 PM, private musings <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Robert / all, > > I wonder if perhaps folk on the foundation-l mailing list may be able > to help with this issue I'm hoping to clarify as tangetial, but > related to the Controversial Content study; > > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Robertmharris#Tangential.2C_but_important > > In short, I've had conversations with various volunteers previously > which indicate that material likely to be child pornography has, in > the past, been uploaded to WMF sites, and that dev.s have previously > removed it from servers - what I'm not clear on is whether or not such > material is routinely reported to external authorities (we may well be > talking about only 2 or 3 cases, perhaps per year, perhaps ever?) - > and the process by which a WMF volunteer should follow should such > material rear its ugly head at some point in the future. > > Depressingly, I think we should prepare for such an eventuality, and > I'll further take the opportunity to encourage whomever is the > decision maker in such instances to permanently remove the photo at > commons of a 16 year old girl masturbating - currently only available > to 'oversighters' here; > > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Robertmharris#Tangential.2C_but_important > > I'll heap praise / feedback on the study in general following any > board action / announcement in the coming days / weeks :-) > > best, > > Peter, > PM. > > ps. on re-reading I realise it's sensible to add 'alleged' to the '16 > year old girl masturbating' - as ever with this stuff, the intent > could well have been to disrupt all along, and it could well just be a > basic copyvio of online material. We can't know. > > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:08 AM, R M Harris <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just to let you know that Part 3 of the Study on Controversial content is >> now up on its own Meta page >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2010_Wikimedia_Study_of_Controversial_Content:_Part_Three. >> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to the discussion so far -- it has >> been expectedly passionate, but very interesting, and illuminating. All >> three parts of the study, combined together, will be presented to the >> Wikimedia Foundation Board on Friday, Oct. 8 at their next meeting. Either >> the Board or we will be following up on that presentation. Thanks again to >> all for allowing us to enter your "house" as a guest; we've been treated >> very civilly, and appreciate it. Robert and Dory Harris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Commons-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l >> >> > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
