On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:53 PM, ???? <wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk> wrote: > On 24/10/2010 19:33, Austin Hair wrote: >> You're asserting, then, that Wikipedia is less reliable than other >> encyclopedias, which the research done on the subject contradicts. > > He is probably thinking about this: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/23/britannica_wikipedia_nature_study/
Even if you ignore the flaws in the Nature study and equate errors-per-article with reliability, it still found that Wikipedia contained more errors-per-article than Britannica. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
