> Those who advocate this, though well meaning, go way beyond our scope. > This is a matter for professional journals, not an unauthoritative > reader-edited encyclopedia > > David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
It is the intention of some of us to both remain broadly edited by the general public and to become authoritative, within the bounds of our general disclaimer, of course. This: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)#Funding_of_cited_research is our workshop. We do our best, but will do better, with patience and practice. Fred _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
