Hoi,
I just checked it again. It is cc-by-sa.
The point of the article is that we need to get our message out. Pointing
out that I have the license wrong does not contribute to the conversation I
hope for... or is that our message?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 6 November 2010 18:02, ???? <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/11/2010 16:22, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> >
> > To start it off, I have blogged some of my sentiments.
> > Thanks,
> > GerardM
> >
> >
> http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.com/2010/11/annual-wikipedia-argument-about.html
>
> You have the license on that image wrong it CC-BY-ND not CC-BY-SA : just
> saying.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
