On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7 November 2010 00:34, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm sure they'd be willing to work out a deal where people can opt-in >> to Wikipedia ads (which wouldn't be subject to the anti-porn rules). >> I doubt they'd allow non-opt-in ads on [[tit torture]], though. > > I'm not convinced opt-in ads would get any significant revenue. Very > few people would opt-in and those that do would probably be people > that are just doing it to get us money and aren't going to click on > the ads, so we wouldn't actually get any money.
Oh, sorry, I just realized how incredibly confusing I phrased that. What I meant by "people can opt-in" was that the advertisers could opt-in to allowing their ads to appear on Wikipedia, so that unsuspecting advertisers didn't wind up having their products displayed on an illustrated article about [[tit torture]]. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
