Thomas Dalton wrote: > It sounds like you are talking more about an inspection than an > ombudsman. The problem with your proposal is that disagreements > between the Foundation and community are usually due to it being very > unclear what the roles of each are. There isn't a rulebook that > someone can make sure the WMF is following. There is a committee > working on clearing up the roles of different parts of the movement, > but I don't know if they'll actually come up with anything specific > enough to be inspected against.
I wouldn't say that disagreements are due to unclear roles. I would say most disagreements come from the Wikimedia Foundation not adhering to its principles, values, and mission as closely as some feel it should. This includes a commitment to transparency and accountability. MZMcBride _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
