I started this thread to discuss Wikimedia's CSR. Unfortunately, people are now debating salaries for the major part of this thread...
~Abbas. > Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:53:32 -0500 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Corporate Social Responsibility > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In a message dated 11/22/2010 2:10:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, > > [email protected] writes: > > > > > > > They aren't - as a > > > member of the audit committee, I have full confidence that the Wikimedia > > > Foundation's tax reports are using the appropriate categories for > > > expenses. > > > > > > So auditing is now about confidence ? > > Something seems wrong with an audit committee who is trusting who they are > > auditing. Isn't the very point of auditing, to not have trust and blind > > faith? > > > > > I think you misunderstood his point, even though it did not seem unclear. > It's perfectly reasonable for someone to have confidence in their own work, > which in this case is the work of the audit committee to determine the > completeness, accuracy and legal sufficiency of financial reporting. > > Nathan > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
