Michael Snow wrote: > On 12/9/2010 3:03 PM, K. Peachey wrote: >> I'm not going to debate the whole wording thing, but I will point out, >> It is a crime to receive property/goods under false pretenses in >> Australia which is what advertising a person with the incorrect job >> title would be. Don't forget it isn't only the foundation handling the >> donations this year, the local chapters are as well. >> -Peachey > You're not going to express an opinion on the merits of the question, > but you're going to insinuate criminality is involved anyway? Come on, > you're better than that. I've already indicated where I stand on this, > but I find it embarrassing to have that position associated with > debating tactics like this. It's a perfect example of why it's often so > easy to dismiss our critics, when their approach involves such sleazy > argumentation.
Calling Jimmy "Wikipedia founder" was already incredibly close to crossing the line. Calling Sue "Wikipedia Executive Director" clearly crosses the line. From reading your posts today, I believe you agree. While I didn't and wouldn't raise the issue of criminality here, the sleazy tactics are in the fundraising approach, not in the criticism. MZMcBride _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
