On 10 December 2010 08:45, Andreas Kolbe <[email protected]> wrote: > Apart from summarising COM:PORN*, all that the draft sexual content policy > was meant to do, actually, was to address two cases: > * Material that is illegal to host for the Foundation under Florida law > * Sexual images of people uploaded without their knowledge and consent
That would be why I voted "yes". The first category is already nuke-on-sight, but the second we had some actual examples of. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
