On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Erik Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: > > But to suggest that the choice of such > shorthand is tantamount to "lying to and misleading our donors" is, > indeed, irresponsible hyperbole. It's clear that the choice was, in > fact, made to _reduce_ potential confusion of donors about who/what > they're being asked to support.
Hang on: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Philippe Beaudette <[email protected]> wrote: > > When we get letters saying things like "I'd donate, but only to Wikipedia, > not to Wikimedia", it spells out for us that it's possible we could attract > more people with the institution of Wikipedia than the institution of > Wikimedia. So wait, why was the choice made? -- Stephen Bain [email protected] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
