Nathan, I understand you don't know me, but can''t you see he is exactly the same as me, an anonymous and uncounted associate, who is as much a shareholder, auditor as I am. The only difference is I don't lead the Movement, I supposedly am lead by anonymous unknowns like him.
E. On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:36 PM, MZMcBride <[email protected]> wrote: > > Achal Prabhala wrote: > >> In all these capacities and more. > > > > 33 > > > >> That's the spirit. And I've always felt that a waste is a terrible thing > >> to mind. > > > > 81 > > > > [links shortened] > >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=2284834#India_planning > >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=2284834#India_planning > > > > First link: 231 > > Second link: 285 > > > >> Settle down, my friend...going around in circles will make us all dizzy. > > > > 72 > > > >> Personally, I recommend half an hour of Pranayama > >> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pranayama) every morning: it makes one > >> feel calm and loving. > > > > 140! > > > > Your commitment to openness and transparency is ready to be transferred > to a > > Twitter account. You'll have to work with Erik to make all of his > openness > > and transparency fit. (In all seriousness, thank you, Erik, for the > > reports.) > > > > I don't know why anyone would be interested (in more than 500 characters) > > about one of the biggest portions of Wikimedia's five-year plan (which > you > > didn't help write, I get it!). But your snide answers to legitimate > > questions only serves to highlight the exact problems and concerns that > most > > people have been quietly observing in you. Good work. > > > > MZMcBride > > > > > > > Honestly, I don't see how you could expect a better set of answers > given your approach. You're not a prosecutor, and you have no right to > interrogate him about whatever "improprieties" you and your supposedly > like-minded (but anonymous and uncounted) associates perceive. You're > also not a shareholder, an auditor, or in any other fashion entitled > to receive polite replies to snide implications of corruption. > > Nathan > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
