Respectfully disagreed re: change from meta to plain wikimedia.org It would be of our convenience but other projects specially non-Wikipedia ones might be weakened their presence. As an invididual Wikiquotian, I'm afraid of that.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Pharos <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 28 January 2011 20:33, phoebe ayers <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Such a solution would make it easier to fold separate wikis >>> (such as a conference wiki) back into Meta when we were done with >>> them, too. >> >> Why fold them into meta afterwards rather than just use Meta from the >> beginning? Isn't the whole point of the proposal that we stop creating >> new wikis for everything? > > Yes, we should start with integrating the most amenable material (ie > the most stable/languishing material on side wikis) onto meta as a > first step in the project. > > Changing the url from meta.wikimedia.org to plain vanilla > wikimedia.org would be one of the last steps, actually. > > This should certainly be a multi-stage process, not something that's > done all in one blow, but it would definitely be good to start a > project for adapting new namespaces on meta soon. > > Thanks, > Richard > (User:Pharos) > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- KIZU Naoko / 木津尚子 member of Wikimedians in Kansai / 関西ウィキメディアユーザ会 http://kansai.wikimedia.jp _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
