Hoi, Even better then URL shorteners is the presentation of the URL in Unicode. This will make the URL readable, memorable and guessable. It may be that this has everything to do with the browser that is used.. It is certainly a good reason to select one browser over an other.
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0shows properly in my browser, it gets spoiled when I past it in my mail.. Thanks, GerardM On 11 February 2011 14:36, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 February 2011 11:30, Mingli Yuan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So I just want to know the possibility that foundation can support it or > > not? > > And how should I improve the work to make foundation accept this service? > > > A URL shortener is a very good idea. > > Even for English, there's http://enwp.org for instance. English > Wikinews has http://enwn.net . Neither of these is official. > > But maybe having an official shortener would be a good idea. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
